Jammers Vs Falsifications

Lately Ukrainians had to choose a person who will lead them to the bright future and yet again some political forces tried to use any chance to gain more votes, even unauthorized ones . In addition to “standard” methods of falsification that were used during previous elections, improved methods of interfering into voting process took place.

It is well-known fact that the most widely spread method of falsification at any elections is bribing of voters. The thing is that this method has one big disadvantage, voter may take money and still give his vote to another candidate. It was almost impossible to find out the voter’s choice until now. Today’s technique made possible for a person to get full control over the voting process of another person with the help of various spy gadgets. Thus some political parties decided to place small secret wireless cams on the bribed voters to get real time video from voting cabin and so got the opportunity to check whether the voter made the “right” decision. Also for these purposes cell phones that support video calls were used.

Knowing all this, some parties provided their representatives with special phone jammers to disrupt 2.4 GHz waves and thus to prevent opponents from using wireless cameras. Also GSM and 3G blockers were used to jam any cell phones at the voting cabins. In the vast majority of cases a single jammer was used. This universal jammer not only jams all those frequencies but also is extremely compact so there were no problems with discreet usage of it.

As you see, blockers become more and more popular at the post-Soviet territories. The demand for phonejammers is growing not only among common people but also among different government officials and organizations. In January 2010 blockers were used at the elections, in spring 2010 cell phoneblockers are supposed to be used during exams at schools. What’s next?

Source text may be found here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts